Impact of Psychological Contract on Organisational Citizenship Behavior

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Abstract

In this global era of competitiveness understanding the psychological facet of job and its impact on the performance of the individual is very important due to ever changing relationships that emerge in an organization. One such facet is the psychological contract that exists in the individuals working in an organization, and other important facet regarding human behaviour towards his job is organization citizenship behaviour of the employee towards his organization which leads to positive outcomes. The present study is aimed to draw the inference regarding the relationship that exists between psychological contract and organizational citizenship behaviour of employees of Infosys Ltd located at Bangalore, Bhubaneswar, Chandigarh, Chennai, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Mangalore, Mysore, Pune and Thiruvananthapuram. The data was collected from a total of 145 employees of Infosys Ltd. selected using snowball sampling. To measure psychological contract of the employees, psychological contract inventory by Rousseau (2000) and for measuring organizational citizenship behaviour the scale developed by Podsakoff et al (2000), was used. The results of the study revealed that a significant correlation exists between psychological contract and organizational citizenship behaviour (r=0.416, p=.000) at significance level less than .01; with respect to dimensions of psychological contract it was found that relational dimension (r=.330, p=.000) and balanced dimension (r=.454, p=.000) had a significant relationship with organizational citizenship behaviour, as p value as less than .000; whereas transactional dimension (r=.050, p=.762) and transitional dimension (r=.014, p=.418) did not had a significant relationship with organizational citizenship behaviour as p value was found greater than .05. The results of the study were consistent with the studies of Robinson & Morrison (1995), Turnley & Feldman, (2000), Kickul & Lester, 2001), Jacqueline & Coyle-Shapiro (2002), Rousseau, et al., (2004), Zagenczyk et al. (2014), Kamil et al. (2014), Paille, P. (2015) Brown & Roloff (2015) and others. This study will help HR managers to find the reason on the basis of which breach of psychological contract is perceived by the employees and the reasons on the basis of which employees reduce their organizational citizenship behaviour. Further recommendations provided will help the organization to ensure appropriatesteps for the fulfilment of psychological contract and hence increased organizational citizenship behaviour.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References

1. Agarwal, P. (2011). Relationship between Psychological Contract & Organizational Commitment in Indian IT Industry. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 47, No. 2 , 290-305.

2. Bateman, T., & Organ, D. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587-595.

3. Bhatnagar, J., & Sandhu, S. (2005). Psychological Empowerment and Organisational Citizenship Behaviour (OCB) in 'IT' Managers: A Talent Retention Tool. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 40, No. 4 , 449-469.

4. Blakerly, G., Andrews, M., & Moorman, R. (2005). The Moderating Effects of Equity Sensitivity on the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 2 , 259-273.

5. Bose, S., & Agarwal, M. (2003). Work environment and perceived fulfilment of psychological contract: A study of private & public sector organisations. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 38, No. 4 , 460-479.

6. Bukhari, Z., & Ali, U. (2009). Relationship between Organizational Citizenship Behavior & Counterproductive Work Behavior in the Geographical Context of Paksitan. International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 4, No. 1 , 85-92.

7. Chiang, C., & Hsieh, T. (2012). The impacts of perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment on job performance: The mediating effects of organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 31 , 180-190.

8. Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2011). Measures of Association. In D. Cooper, & P. Schindler, Business Research Methods (pp. 544-552). New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Limited.

9. Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2006). The characterstics of Good Measurement. In D. Cooper, & P. Schindler, Business Reseacrh Methods (pp. 318-325). New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.

10. Cooper, D., & Schindler, S. (2006). Tests of Significance. In D. Cooper, & S. Schindler, Business Research Methods (pp. 502-505). New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.

11. Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Kessler, I. (2000). Consequence of psychological contract for the employment relationship: a large scale survey. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 37 , 903-930.

12. Dick, P. (2006). The Psychological Contract and the Transition from Full to Part-Time Police Work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 27, No. 1 , 37-58.

13. Dyne, L., & Ang, S. (1998). Organizational Citizenship Behavior of Contingent Workers in Singapore. The Academy of Management Journal , 692-703.

14. Gakovic, A., & Tetrick, L. (2003). Psychological Contract Breach as a Source of Strain for Employees. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 2 , 235-246.

15. Guangling, W. (2010). The Study on Relationship between Employees’ Sense of Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Private Enterprises. Energy Procedia 5 (2011) , 2030-2034.

16. Ho, V. T. (2005). Social Influence on Evaluation of Psychological Contract Fulfillment . The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, No. 1 , 113-128.

17. Jacqueline, A., & Coyle-Shapiro, M. (2002). A Psychological Contract Perspective on Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 8 , 927-946.

18. Jafari, P., & Bidarian, S. (2012). The relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior. Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 47 , 1815-20.

19. Jafari, P., & Bidarian, S. (2012). The relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 47 , 1815-1820.

20. Johnson, J., & O'Leary-Kelly, A. (2003). The Effects of Psychological Contract Breach and Organizational Cynicism: Not All Social Exchange Violations Are Created Equal. Journal of Organizational Behvaior, Vol. 24, No. 5 , 627-47.

21. Jones, J., & Schabroeck, J. (2004). Mediators of the Relationship Between Race and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 16, No. 4 , 505- 527.

22. Kickul, J., & Lester, S. (2001). Broken Promises: Equity Sentivity as a Moderator between Psychological Contract Breach and Employee Attitude and Behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 16, No. 2 , 191-217.

23. . McInnis, K., Meyer, J., & Feldman, S. (2009). Psychological contracts and their implications for commitment: A feature based approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 165-180.

24. Morrison, E. (1994). Role Definitions and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Importance of the Employee's Perspective. The of Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 6 , 1543-67.

25. NASSCOM. (2015). Industry Rankings. Retrieved Sept 6, 2015, from www.nasscom.org: http://www.nasscom.in/industry-ranking.

26. Neuman, G., & Kickul, J. (1998). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Achievement Orientation and Personality. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 2 , 263-279.

27. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw–Hill.

28. O'Reilly, C., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology,71 , 492-499.

29. Organ, D. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12 , 43-72.

30. Peelle, H. (2007). Reciprocating Perceived Organizational Support through Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 19, No. 4 , 554-575.

31. Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Moorman, R., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 9 , No. 4 ,107-142.

32. Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and Breach of Psychological Contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 4 , 574-599.

33. Robinson, S., & Morrison, E. (1995). The Effect of Unfulfilled Obligations on Civic Virtue Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 16, No. 3 , 289-298.

34. Robinson, S., & Rousseau, D. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.15 , No3, 245-259.

35. Robinson, S., & Rousseau, D. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 15 , 245-259.

36. Rousseau, D. M. (2000). Psychological Contract Inventory Technical Report. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.

37. Rousseau, D. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, Vol 8, No. 3 , 121-139.

38. Rousseau, D., Hui, C., & Lee, C. (2004). Psychological Contract and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in China: Invetigating Generalizability and Instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, No. 2 , 311-321.

39. Turnley, W., & Feldman, D. (2000). Re-Examining the Effects of Psychological Contract Violations: Unmet Expectations and Job Dissatisfaction as Mediators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21, No. 1 , 25-42.

40. Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Redrawing the Boundaries of OCB An Empirical Examination of Compulsory Extra-Role Behavior in the Workplace. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 3 , 377-405.

41. Williamson, O. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, Vol 22, No. 3, 233-261.