A Systematic Review of Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reaction

Main Article Content

Abstract

The history of pharmacovigilance started back 169 years ago with the death of a 15- year-old girl, Hannah Greener. However, the Thalidomide incident of 1961 brought a sharp change in the pharmacovigilance process, with adverse drug reaction reporting being systematic, spontaneous, and regulated timely. Therefore, continuous monitoring of marketed drugs was essential to ensure the safety of public health. Any observed adverse drug reaction detected by signals was to be reported by the health profession. Moreover, signal detection became the primary goal of pharmacovigilance based on reported cases. Among various methods used for signal detection, the Spontaneous Reporting System was most widely preferred; although, it had the limitation of "underreporting". Gradually, the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre and "Uppsala Monitoring Centre" were established in 1978 for international monitoring of drugs. The center was responsible for operating various databases like vigiflow, vigibase, vigilyze, and vigiaccess. Recently, huge data could be generated through spontaneous reporting linked with computational methods, such as Bayesian Framework, ESynthesis. Furthermore, drug safety surveillance at an early stage prior to the official alerts or regulatory changes was made possible through social media. In addition, India created a National Pharmacovigilance Program, and Schedule Y of the Drug and Cosmetic Act 1945 was reviewed and amended in 2005

References

www.pwc.com/pharma

; drug-safety.

Source: The Importance of Pharmacovigilance, WHO, 2002.

World Health Organization.

Safety of Medicines: A Guide to Detecting and Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions – Why Health Professionals Need to Take Action.

Geneva: WHO; 2002.

Kumanan R, Sudha S, Vijayashre P, Charumath S, Gowridevi KC, Mahesh M.

Imperative approach on pharmacovigilance in Indian systems of medicines.

International Journal of Pharma Sciences and Research (IJPSR). 2010;1(9):378–390.

World Health Organization.

Safety Monitoring of Medicinal Products: Guidelines for Setting up and Running a Pharmacovigilance Centre.

Uppsala: Uppsala Monitoring Centre; WHO; 2000.

Bord CA, Rachi CL.

Adverse drug reactions in United States hospitals.

Pharmacotherapy. 2006;26(5):601–608.

Kumar S, Baldi A.

Pharmacovigilance in India: Perspectives and prospects.

Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2013;3(4):237–246.

Shukla SS, Gidwani B, Pandey R, Rao SP, Singh V, Vyas A.

Importance of pharmacovigilance in Indian pharmaceutical industry.

Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Science. 2012;2:04–08.

Amarnath S, Jaikumar S, Basalingappa S, Thulasimani M, Ramaswamy S.

Pharmacovigilance for healthcare professional students.

Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2013;4:1204–1217.

Muraraiah S, Rajarathna K, Sreedhar D, Basavalingu D, Jayanthi CR.

A questionnaire study to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice of pharmacovigilance in a paediatric tertiary care centre.

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 2011:416–422.

Ghosh R, Bhatia MS, Bhattacharya SK.

Pharmacovigilance: Master key to drug safety monitoring and its status in India.

Delhi Psychiatry Journal. 2012;15:412–415.

Moore N.

The role of the clinical pharmacologist in the management of ADRs.

Drug Safety. 2001;24(1):1–7.

Kulkarni RD.

Reporting system for rare side effects of non-narcotic analgesics in India: Problems and opportunities.

Med Toxicol. 1986;1:110–113.

Protocol for National Pharmacovigilance Program.

CDSCO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. November 2004.

Pharmacovigilance Programme for India (PvPI): Assuring Drug Safety.

CDSCO, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

Available from: http://cdsco.nic.in/pharmacovigilance.htm

(Accessed: Aug 20, 2013).

Danan G, Benichou C.

Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs: a novel method based on conclusions of international consensus meetings.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(1):132–142.

Blanc S, Leuenberger P, Berger JP, Brooke EM, Schelling JL.

Judgments of trained observers on adverse drug reactions.

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;25:493–498.

Bhosale U, Jaiswal S, Yegnanarayan R, Godbole G.

A pharmacovigilance study of anti-asthmatic agents in patients of bronchial asthma at a tertiary care hospital.

Journal of Clinical & Experimental Research. 2013;1:26–30.

Sharma S, Phadnis P, Gajbhiye S.

Pharmacovigilance: Its awareness and impact in a tertiary care teaching medical college in Central India.

International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Bio-Science. 2013;2:234–247.

Padmavathi GV, Beere N, Divakara P, Suresh KP, Surendranath A, Patel RS.

Pharmacovigilance awareness among nursing staff in Bangalore.

2013;365–370.

Leon L, Herbert A. Liberman, Joseph L. Kanig.

Pharmaceutical Textbook. 3rd Edition. Mumbai: Varghese Publishing House; pp. 239–240.

Hall et al. (1995); Horbuckle et al. (1999); Tuntti and Neuronen (2002).

Moore N.

The role of clinical pharmacologist in management of ADRs.

Drug Safety. 2001;21(1):1–7.

World Health Organization.

The Importance of Pharmacovigilance: Safety Monitoring of Medical Products. Geneva: WHO; 2002.

Ioannidis JP, Lau J.

Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of seven medical areas.

JAMA. 2001;285(4):437–443.

Campbell JE, Gossell-Williams M, Lee MG.

A review of pharmacovigilance.

West Indian Medical Journal. 2014;63(7):771–774.