Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal

DIAS Technology Review

The Institute has a unique distinction of publishing a bi-annual International journal DIAS Technology Review – The International Journal for Business and IT. The Editorial Board comprises of...

ISSN: 2231-2498 Quarterly English Since 2011
Current Issue

Vol. 18 No. 1 (2021)

Articles 35th Edition of DTR Apr 2021 – Sep 2021

Contagious COVID 19: Leading to Hysteria in Indian Stock Marketsand Sectoral Indices Performance

Authors
54 Views
39 Downloads
Published 2026-02-05
Abstract

The eruption of the novel corona virus in India has led to the outflow of panic due to high media coverage. This unparalleled broadcast of news has led to swift flow of information to investors and reactions can be assessed with increased volatility in financial markets. EGARCH (1,1) Model is applied to determine the relationship between the market returns of different industries along with the panic generated due to media coverage about the corona virus outbreak. Imposition of mobility control in terms of Lockdown has exerted the significant impact on stock market and sectoral indices returns. And depending on the nature of the business associated, different sectors have performed in a different way to this corona virus outburst. Even if returns are not affected directly then conditional volatility pervasiveness can easily be detected. So, the news burdened with panic and negative sentiment has definitely contributed to a prodigious level of volatility in the sectors professed to be most affected by the corona virus outbreak in India

Keywords
Corona virus, COVID-19, Sectoral Indices Performance, EGARCH Model, Conditional Volatility, Panic Index, Nifty 50, Media Coverage
References
  1. i. Al-awadhi, A. M., Alsaifi, K., Al-awadhi, A., &Alhammadi, S. (2020). Death and
  2. contagious infectious diseases/ : Impact of the COVID-19 virus on stock market
  3. returns. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 27, 100326.
  4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100326
  5. ii. Angabini, A., &Wasiuzzaman, S. (2011). GARCH Models and the Financial CrisisA Study of the Malaysian. The International Journal of Applied Economics and
  6. FinanceVol.5 No, 3, 226-236
  7. iii. Baig, A.S., Butt, H.A., Haroon, O., Aun, S., & Rizvi, R. (2020). Deaths , Panic ,
  8. Lockdowns and US Equity Markets/: The Case of COVID-19 Pandemic. SSRN
  9. Electronic Journal, April, 1-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3584947
  10. iv. Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., Davis, J., Kost, K., Sammon, M., &Viratyosin, T. (2020). The
  11. unprecedented stock market reaction to Covid-19. The National Bureau of
  12. Economic Research, 1(DP 14543), 33-42. Working Paper available at
  13. https://marcosammon.com/images/StockMarkets_COVID.pdf
  14. v. Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., &Vishny, R. (1998). A model of investor sentiment.
  15. Journal of financial economics, 49(3), 307-343.
  16. vi. Casas Monsegny, M., & Cepeda Cuervo, E. (2008). Modelos ARCH, GARCH y
  17. EGARCH: aplicaciones a series financieras. Cuadernos de economia, 27 (48),
  18. 287-319.
  19. vii. Corbet, S., Larkin, C. J., & Lucey, B. M. (2020). The Contagion Effects of the
  20. COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Gold and Cryptocurrencies. Financial
  21. Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3564443 Ederington, L. H., &
  22. Lee, J. H. (1996). The creation and resolution of market uncertainty: the impact
  23. of information releases on implied volatility. Journal of Financial and
  24. Quantitative Analysis, 31(4), 513-539. Ezzat, H. (2012). The application of
  25. GARCH and EGARCH in modeling the volatility of daily stock returns during
  26. massive shocks: The empirical case of Egypt. International Research Journal of
  27. Finance and Economics,96, 143-154
  28. viii. Gro&-Klu&mann, A., &Hautsch, N. (2011). When machines read the news: Using
  29. automated text analytics to quantify high frequency news-implied market
  30. reactions. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18(2), 321-340.
  31. ix. Liew, V. K., & Puah, C. H. (2020). Chinese stock market sector indices
  32. performance in the time of novel coronavirus pandemic. May, 1-23.
  33. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202005.0279.v1
  34. x. Nelson, D.B. (1991). Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: anew
  35. approach. Econometrica, 59, 347-370.
  36. xi. Onali, E. (2020). COVID-19 and Stock Market Volatility. SSRN Electronic Journal,
  37. February, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3571453
  38. xii. Rizvi, S. A. R., & Arshad, S. (2018). Understanding time-varying systematic risks
  39. in Islamic and conventional sectoral indices. Economic Modelling, 70(October),
  40. 561-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.10.011
  41. xiii. Rogone, L., Hyde, S., & Zhang, S.S. (2020). News sentiment in the cryptocurrency
  42. market: An empirical comparison with Forex. International Review of Financial
  43. Analysis. 69, 101462
  44. xiv. Tetlock, P.C. (2007). Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in
  45. the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 62(3), 1139-1168.
  46. xv. Villarreal-Samaniego, Dacio. (2020). COVID-19, Oil Prices, and Exchange Rates: A
  47. Five-Currency Examination. SSRN Electronic Journal, May
  48. »https://ssrn.com/abstract=3593753 or
  49. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3593753
  50. xvi. Westerlund, J., & Narayan, P. (2015). Testing for predictability in conditionally
  51. heteroskedastic stock returns. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 13(2), 342-
  52. 375. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbu001
  53. xvii. Zhang, D., Hu, M., & Ji, Q. (2020). Financial markets under the global pandemic of
  54. COVID-19. Finance Research Letters, April, 101528. https://doiorg/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101528
  55. xviii. https://www.statista.com/search/?q=coronavirus+case
  56. Source: Johns Hopkins University; WHO; Worldometers; Ministry of Health and
  57. Family Welfare (India)
  58. xix. https://coronavirus.ravenpack.com/india/Source: Ravenpack Finance
✓ Citation copied to clipboard