Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal

DIAS Technology Review

The Institute has a unique distinction of publishing a bi-annual International journal DIAS Technology Review – The International Journal for Business and IT. The Editorial Board comprises of...

ISSN: 2231-2498 Quarterly English Since 2011
Current Issue

Vol. 17 No. 2 (2021)

Articles 34th Edition of DTR Oct 2020 – Mar 2021
DOI 10.65301/dias.2021.17.2.1020

Determinants of Innovation Capabilities at Firm Level: Auto Components Sector

Authors

Research Scholar, USMS, GGSIPU, Delhi, India

Professor, USMS, GGSIPU, Delhi, India 

Professor, USMS, GGSIPU, Delhi, India

31 Views
21 Downloads
Published 2021-03-31
Pages 13-21
Abstract

Firm characteristics are defined by rapid changes, extensive impact of globalization, hyper innovative competitors, etc and recent studies have stipulated that one of the most dynamic capabilities that leads to strongest level of competitiveness in any organisation is innovation capability. A firms' capabilities are important in providing and sustaining its competitive advantage, and in the implementation of the entire strategy. As innovation is becoming increasingly complex, therefore a wide variety of assets, resources, and capabilities are required to make such innovation capabilities successful. Therefore, innovation capability should be defined in a wide disperse scopes and levels in order to accord with the requirements of firm strategy and accommodate to the special conditions and competition environment. The need of the hour is, that many organisations have now begin to focus on the need to identify innovation capabilities, resources and strengths through an inside-out view. Innovation capabilities are not necessarily defined by a new product or service, but also through new administrative practice or process, new strategies in place to improve process performance, etc. The objective of this research paper is to identify key determinants of innovation capabilities present in an auto components cluster firms

Keywords
Technological innovation capabilities, Auto component cluster, Firm level innovation capabilities
References
  1. Adler, BS. and Shenbar, A. (1990), “Adapting your technological base: the
  2. organizational challenge”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 25, pp. 25-37.
  3. ii. Akgiin, A. E., Keskin, H., Byrne, J. C., and Aren, S. (2007) “Emotional and learning
  4. capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance’,
  5. Technovation, Vol.27, pp.501-513
  6. iii. Alegre, J. and Cheeva, R. (2008) “Assessing the impact of organizational learning
  7. capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test”, Technovation,
  8. Vol. 28, pp. 315-326.
  9. iv. Ancona, D. and Caldwell, D. (1987), “Management issues facing new product
  10. teams in high technology companies”, Advances in Industrial and Labour
  11. Relations, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 191-221.
  12. v. Anderson J. C. and Gerbing D. W. (1988) Structural Equation Modeling in
  13. Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-step Approach,
  14. PsychologicalBulletin, 103 (3) 411-423. Anderson J. C. and Gerbing D. W. (1988)
  15. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Twostep Approach, PsychologicalBulletin, 103 (3) 411-423.
  16. vi. Bobe, B., Bobe, A.C., 1998. Benchmarking Innovation Practices of European
  17. Firms, Joint Research Centre, European Commission (EC). Brussels,
  18. Luxembourg: ECSC-EEC-EAEC.
  19. vii. Browne, M. W. and Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In:
  20. Bollen, K. A. and Long, J. S. (Eds.) Testing Structural Equation Models. Sage, CA:
  21. 136-162.
  22. viii. Burgelman, R., Kosnik, T.J.and Van Den Poel, M. (1988), “Toward an innovative
  23. capability audit framework’, in Burgelman, R.A. and Maidique, M.A. (Eds),
  24. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, Irwin, Homewood, IL
  25. ix. Burgelman, R., Maidique, M. A. andWheelwright, S.C. (2004). Strategic
  26. Management of Technology and Innovation, McGraw Hill, NewYork
  27. x. Burgelman, R., Maidique, M.A. and Wheelwright, S.C. (2004), Strategic
  28. Management of Technology and Innovation, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, pp. 8-
  29. 12.
  30. xi. lan, P. and Voss, C.A.(1996). Development of a Technical Innovation Audit,
  31. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 1
  32. xii. Christensen, J.E (1995). Asset Profiles for Technological Innovation, Research
  33. Policy, Vol. 24, pp727-745
  34. xiii. Cooper, R.G., 1980. Factors in new product success. European Journal of
  35. Marketing 15 (5-6), 277-292.
  36. xiv. Cooper, R.G., 1996. Overhauling the new product process. Industrial Marketing
  37. Management 25, 465-482.
  38. xv. Dierickx, I., Cool, K., 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of
  39. competitive advantage. Management Science 35, 1504-1511
  40. xvi. Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.
  41. Wiley, NewYork.
  42. xvii. | DTI: Department of Trade and Industry. (2003). Department of Trade and
  43. Industry, http://www.dti.gov.uk/.
  44. xviii. Evangelista, R., lammarino, S., Mastrostefano, V. and Silvani, A. (2001),
  45. “Measuring the regional dimension of innovation. Lessons from the Italian
  46. Innovation Survey”, Technovation, Vol.21 No. 11, pp. 733-45.
  47. xix. Evangelista, R., Perani, G., Rapiti, E and Archibugi, D. (1997), “Nature and impact
  48. of innovation in manufacturing: some evidence from the Italian innovation
  49. survey”, Research Policy, Vol. 26, pp. 521-36.
  50. xx. Gerbing, D.W., and Anderson, J.C. (1988) “An updated paradigm for scale
  51. development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment’, Journal of
  52. Marketing Research, Vol. 25,No. 2, pp. 186-192.
  53. xxi. Guan, J.and Ma, N. (2003), “Innovation capability and export performance of
  54. Chinese firms”, Technovation, Vol. 23 No. 9, pp. 737-47.
  55. xxii. Guan, J.and Ma, N. (2003), Innovative Capability and Export Performance of
  56. Chinese Firms, Technovation, Vol. 23, pp737-747.
  57. xxiii. Guan, J.(2002), Comparison Study of Industrial Innovation between China and
  58. Some European Countries, Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol.
  59. 43, No.3
  60. xxiv. Guan, J.C., Mok, C.K., Yam, R.C.M., Chin, K.S. and Pun, K.E (2006), “Technology
  61. transfer and innovation performance: evidence from Chinese firms”,
  62. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 73, pp. 666-78.
  63. xxv. Guan, J.C., Yam, R.C.M. and Mok, C.K. (2005), “Collaboration between industry
  64. and research institutes/universities on industrial innovation in Beijing, China’,
  65. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol.17 No.3, pp. 339-53.
  66. xxvi. Hair, J.E, Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data
  67. Analysis. Seventh Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
  68. xxvii. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. (1994). Competing for the Future. Harvard Business
  69. School Press.
  70. xxviii. Hooper, D. Coughlan, J. and Mullen, M.R., 2008. Structural Equation Modelling:
  71. Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research
  72. Methods Volume 6 Issue 1 2008 (53-60).
  73. xxix. Kline, R.B. (1998), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, The
  74. Guilford Press, New York
  75. xxx. Kvale, S. (2007) Doing Interviews, Sage Publications, London.
  76. xxxi. Lall, S. (1992), “Technological capabilities and industrialization’, World
  77. Development, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 165-86.
  78. xxxii. Lall, S., (1992), Technological Capabilities and Industrialization, Wrld
  79. Development, Vol.20, No. 2, pp165—168
  80. xxxiii. Lawless, M.J. and Fisher, R.J. (1990). Sources of Durable Competitive Advantages
  81. in New Products, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.7, No. 1, pp35-
  82. 43.
  83. xxxiv. Malhotra, N.K. and Birks, D.E (2006) Marketing Research: an Applied Approach,
  84. Pearson Publication, UK.
  85. xxxv. OECD (1992), OSLO Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting
  86. Technological Innovation Data, OECD, Paris.
  87. xxxvi. OECD (1997), OSLO Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting
  88. Technological Innovation Data, OECD, Paris.
  89. xxxvii. Peteraf, M. (1993), “The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resourcebased view’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 179- 91
  90. xxxviii. Prahalad, C., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation.
  91. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
  92. xxxix. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. RexB. Kline. 2005.
  93. xl. Robock, S.H. (1980) The International Technology Transfer Process, National
  94. Academy Sciences. Washington D.C.
  95. xli. Romijn, H. and Albaladejo, M. (2002), “Determinants of innovation capability in
  96. small electronics and software firms in southeast England’, Research Policy, Vol.
  97. 31, pp. 1053-67.
  98. xlii. Rothwell, R., 1992. Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the
  99. 1990’s. RkD Management 223, 221-239.
  100. xliii. Scholl, H. (2005). Innovationas drivers of growth. CBI Conference Synopsis
  101. Sharing Knowledge with the Business and Academic Communities. Carnegie
  102. Bosch Institute for Applied Studies in International Management.
  103. xliv. Tirupati, D. (2008) “Role of technological innovations for competitiveness and
  104. entrepreneurship. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, Vol.17, No. 2, pp. 103-115.
  105. xlv. Yam, C.M, Guan, J.C, Pun, K.E and Tam, PY. (2004). An Audit of Technological
  106. Innovation Capabilities in Chinese Firms: Some Empirical Findings in Beijing,
  107. China, Research Policy, Vol. 33, No. 8, pp1123-1250
✓ Citation copied to clipboard