Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal

DIAS Technology Review

The Institute has a unique distinction of publishing a bi-annual International journal DIAS Technology Review – The International Journal for Business and IT. The Editorial Board comprises of...

P-ISSN: 0972-9658 English Since 2004
Current Issue

Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020)

Articles 32th Edition of DTR Oct 2019 – Mar 2020
DOI 10.65301/dias.2020.16.2.6

Analysis of Health Record Management System in Private Hospitals

Authors

Research Scholar CMR University Bangalore, India

Professor and Head of the Department of MBA Cambridge Institute of Technology,
Bangalore, India

23 Views
18 Downloads
Published 2020-03-30
Abstract

The National Health Policy of India, 2017 emphasizes that at district level there should be electronic database at all health care systems by 2020. Health record of any patient is the most important document which gives information about the patient's health in past and present which helps doctors to give better and faster treatment to the patients. The study was conducted at selected private hospitals in Karnataka to assess the usage and challenges in implementing electronic health management system. Karnataka is the eight largest state in area, geographically in India. It was found that it is easier to use EHR in health centres with lesser number of patients when compared to health centres where large number of patients had to be examined every day. Ina few private hospitals EHR was not implemented and manual record system was in use. Majority of them looked forward to moving to using EHRs, although a small number of them were reluctant to shift from manual system as they were at ease at using the manual system for many years. It was found that some of the respondents who do not use computers often found it difficult to make entries on the system

Keywords
EHR, NHB health record, health centre
References
  1. I. i Arya, D. K.(2015). Is it time to stop writing discharge summaries? [online]. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management,.10(2),68-73. Retrieved from http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=445704802911875;res=IELHEA>
  2. II. Burrows, Ashley, (2014), An Analysis of the Obstacles to a Full Adoption of Electronic Medical Records, The Journal of Government Financial Management; Alexandria,63( 4), 24-30, retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/1cd840a9917£75a3d0636677213abc0b/ 12pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=26015
  3. III. Callan, Clair M; DeShazo, Claude. (Nov/Dec 2007).How to Navigate Health Care Information Technology and Electronic Medical Records.Physician Executive; Tampa , 33(6) 36-8, 40-2. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/a60a3a0e6d0a56af004286751a22d9e5
  4. IV. C6rtes,Pedro Luiz; Cortes,ElianaGolfette de Paula.(2011). Hospital information systems: a study of electronic patient records. JISTEM J.Inf.Syst. Technol. Manag,8(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-17752011000100008 .
  5. V. Cresswell, Kathrin, M. (2012). Implementation and adoption of the first national electronic health record: a qualitative exploration of the perspectives of key stakeholders in selected English care settings drawing on sociotechnical principles. Retrieved from https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/6519.
  6. VI. Kalpa, Sharma. (2017). Health IT in Indian Healthcare System: A New Initiative. Research Gate. Retrieved from
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268005455.
  8. VII. Miller ,Robert H. and Sim ,Ida (2004). Physicians' Use of Electronic Medical Records: Barriers And Solutions. Health Affairs,23(2). Retrieved from https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.116
  9. VIII. Parvin Lakbala, Kavoos Dindarloo. (Feb 2014). Physicians' perception and attitude toward electronic medical record. SpringerPlus,3,63.
  10. IX. Ralston, James;Coleman, Katie;Reid, Robert et.al. (April 2010). Patient Experience should be part of meaningful - use criteria. Health Affairs, 29 (4), 607- 13. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/7b63a93bdc645182ef1lcaead9e38eed3
✓ Citation copied to clipboard