Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal

DIAS Technology Review

The Institute has a unique distinction of publishing a bi-annual International journal DIAS Technology Review – The International Journal for Business and IT. The Editorial Board comprises of...

P-ISSN: 0972-9658 English Since 2004
Current Issue

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016)

Articles 26th Edition of DTR Oct 2016 – Mar 2017

Assessing Motivation* Assistant Prof. Department of Management Studies, YMCA University of Science and Technology, Faridabad, India, Email: anushree27973@gmail.com ** Associate Prof., Department of Management Studies, YMCA University of Science and Technology, Faridabad, India, Email: singla_manisha@rediffmail.com *** Professor, Department of Management Studies, YMCA University of Science and Technology, Faridabad, India, Email: prof.rituarora@gmail.comAmong Academicians

Authors


 Assistant Prof. Department of Management Studies, YMCA University of Science and Technology, Faridabad, India

Associate Prof., Department of Management Studies, YMCA University of Science and Technology, Faridabad, India

Professor, Department of Management Studies, YMCA University of Science and Technology, Faridabad, India

24 Views
15 Downloads
Published 2017-03-31
Pages 41-54
Abstract

Changing the work related needs, motives and values of one person in an organization is a daunting challenge. People work in organizations for a varied variety of reasons. Employees want money, safety, security and recognition for the jobs they are performing. Their requirements vary as per their life styles, background, education and type of organizations they are working with. What each unique person in an organization want from work plays an instrumental role in determining that person's motivation to work. Motivation is vital to all organizations and often the difference between highly effective and less effective ones lies in motivation of their members also it is an important determinant of performance. The motivation among academicians is far more important for development of younger generation. The present study aims to understand how faculty performance can be improved by focusing on what motivates a faculty at different hierarchical positions. This study attempts to evaluate, analyse and compare the faculty motivation with their respective designations on the basis of the factors ascertained after thorough literature review through structured questionnaire and sample size of 200 academicians working in various universities and affiliated colleges in Delhi and NCR. Delhi and NCR was identified to confine the study to a manageable boundary to ensure effectiveness, validity and reliability on a 5-point Likert scale. The results clearly showed that the motivational factors vary as per the respective designations of the faculty i.e. Professor, Associate Professor and Assistant Professor in spite of working in same institute or university. Results also depicts that it is the management's responsibility to understand the nature of individual motivation, especially as it applies to work situation of an institution.

Keywords
Academician,Motivation,Commitment,Need for affiliation, Need for achievement
References
  1. 1. AISHE, (2011-12), Government of India Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of Higher Education, New Delhi, 2013.
  2. 2. Baron, H., Henley, S., Mc Gibbon, A. & Mc Carthy, T., (2002), Motivation questionnaire manual and user's guide. Sussex: Saville and Holdsworth Limited.
  3. 3. B. Kumar, Ravi, (2013), Factors Affecting the Motivation of Teaching Staff (An Empirical Study With Reference To Engineering Colleges, Krishna District,
  4. Review of Arts and Humanities,Vol. 2(1).
  5. 4. Connelly, Lynne, M., (2008), Pilot Studies, MedSurg Nursing, 17(6), 411-2.
  6. 5. Cronbach, L., J., (1951), Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests, Psychometrika,Vol.16, 297-334.
  7. 6. Devadass, R., (2011), Employees Motivation in Organizations: An integrative literature Review, International Conference on Sociality and Economics
  8. Development, IPED Vol.10, IACSIT Press, Singapore.
  9. 7. Duncan, D., Nulty, (2008), The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done?, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,
  10. 33(3), 301–314, ISSN 0260-2938 print/ISSN 1469-297X online © Taylor & Francis .
  11. 8. Flora, F. Tien, (2008),What kinds of faculty are motivated to perform research by the desire for promotion?, High Education by Springer, 55, 17–32.
  12. 9. Gupta Deepti, Gupta Navneet (2012), Higher Education in India: Structure, Statistics and Challenges, Journal of Education and practice, 3(2).
  13. 10. Hair, J., F., Jr, Black, C.,W., Babin, J., B., Anderson, R., E., and Tatham, L., R., (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed., Prentice-Hall.
  14. 11. Hill, M., D., (1986), A Theoretical Analysis of Faculty Job Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction, Educational Research, Quaterly, 36-44.
  15. 12. Ifinedo, P.,(2003), Employee motivation and job satisfaction in Finnish organizations: a study of employees in the Oulu region, Finland, Master of Business
  16. Administration Thesis, University of London.
  17. 13. Jennifer Rowley (1996), Motivation and academic staff in higher education, Quality Assurance in Education, 4(3), 11-16.
  18. 14. Kapur Devesh (2010), Indian Higher Education, National Bureau of Economic Research, University of Chicago Press, 305 - 334, ISBN: 0-226-11044-3; 978-0-
  19. 226-11044-8.
  20. 15. Kovach, K., A., (1987),What motivates employees? Workers and supervisors give different answers, Business Horizons, 30(5), 58-65.
  21. 16. Kovach, K., A., (1980),Why motivational theories don't work, SAM Advanced Management Journal, 45(2), 54-90.
  22. 17. Lacy, F., J., Sheehan, B., A., (1997), Job satisfaction among academic staff: an international perspective, Higher Education, 34(3), 305-322.
  23. 18. Leung, T.,W., Siu, O., L., & Spector, P., E., (2000), Faculty Stressors, Job Satisfaction, and Psychological Distress among University Teachers in Hong Kong: The
  24. Role of Locus of Control, International Journal of Stress Management,7, 121-138.
  25. 19. Mushtaq, A., Sajid, Imrab, Shaheen, (2013), Factors responsible for High and Low Motivational level of University Academicians, International Journal of
  26. Science and Research, ISSN: 2319‐7064, 2 (2)
  27. 20. Nunnally, J., (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  28. 21. Pearson, D., A., and Seiler, R., E., (1983), Environmental Satisfiers in Academicians, Higher Education, 12, 35-47.
  29. 22. Rosenfeld, R.H. & Wilson, D.C.(1999), Managing Organizations : Text, Readings & Case,
  30. 23. Published by McGraw Hill Publishing Company, Maidenhead, Berkshire, ISBN 10: 0077076435 / ISBN 13: 9780077076436
  31. 24. Sajid, S., M., & Sumbul, Tahir, (2014), Job satisfaction among college teachers: a comparative analysis, The IUP Journal of organisational behaviour, 13(1).
  32. 25. Sinha Smrita, Singh Ajay Kr. , Gupta Nisha & Dutt Rajul (2010), Impact of work culture on motivation and performance level of employees in private sector
  33. companies, Actao economica pragensia,Vol.6, 49-62.
  34. 26. Steers, R., M., Mowday, R., T., & Shapiro, D., L., (2004), The Future of Work Motivation Theory, Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 337-351.
  35. 27. Thomas, Li-Ping, Tang, & Mitchell, Chamberlain, (2010), Effects of Rank, Tenure, Length of Service, and Institution on Faculty Attitudes towards Research
  36. and Teaching: The Case of Regional State Universities, Taylor and Francis online journal, 103-110.
  37. 28. Tien, Flora, F., and Blackburn, Robert, T., (1996), Faculty rank system, research motivation, and faculty research productivity: Measure refinement and theory
  38. testing, Journal of Higher Education, 67, 2-11
  39. 29. Tulsee, Giri, Goswami, & Harsh, Dwivedi, (2011). “The motivation level of male and female academicians: a Comparative Study (Special Concern to
  40. Professional Academicians)”. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance,2(2).
  41. 30. UGC, (2012), guidelines for minimum academic performance and service requirements for promotion of teachers in universities.
  42. 31. Van Belle, G.,(2002), Statistical Rule of Thumb, New York: John Wiley.
  43. 32. Wiley, Carolyn, (1997),What motivates employees according to over 40 years of motivation surveys, International Journal of manpower, 18(3), 263-280.
✓ Citation copied to clipboard