Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal

DIAS Technology Review

The Institute has a unique distinction of publishing a bi-annual International journal DIAS Technology Review – The International Journal for Business and IT. The Editorial Board comprises of...

P-ISSN: 0972-9658 English Since 2004
Current Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2014)

Articles 21th Edition of DTR Apr 2014 – Sep 2014
DOI 10.65301/jkrt.dias.2014.11.1.405

Improving Productivity Using Lean Six-Sigma

Authors
205 Views
263 Downloads
Published 2025-08-27
Pages 34-37
Abstract

 Lean Six-Sigma is usual advocated as a process for quality improvement and productivity is viewed as a by-product of the process. This paper 
explores the use of Lean Six-Sigma as a methodology for productivity improvement as a major goal. The metrics for success must necessarily 
incorporate productivity.  The paper provides a measurement approach that explicitly targets productivity improvements for the firm while 
meeting customer demand for quality.

Keywords
Quality, Productivity Improvement, Six-Sigma, Lean Philosophy
References
  1. Box, George and Luceno, Alberto (1999). Quality Quandries-Six-Sigma Process Drift, Capability Indices, and Feedback Adjustment, Report No. 176, Center for
  2. Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
  3. • Ohno, Taiichi (1988). Toyota Production System. Productivity Press. p. 8. ISBN 0-915299-14-3.
  4. • Bodek, Norman (2004), "KAIKAKU - The Power and Magic of Lean - A study In Knowledge Transfer, PCS, Inc., PCS Press, Vancouver, WA 98664, 2004.
  5. • Spear, S. and Bowen, K (1998), "Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System", HBR, September-October, 1999.
  6. • Harry, M. (1994) The Vision of Six-Sigma, Roadmap for Breakthrough, Sigma Publishing Company, May, 1988, 60-64.
  7. • Hoerl, R.W. (1998) Six-Sigma and the Future of the Quality Profession, Quality Progress, June, 35-42
  8. • Jusko, J. (1999). A Look at Lean, Industrial Week, December 6.
  9. • MacGregor, J.F. (1987) Interfaces Between Process Control and Online Statistical Control, Computing Systems Technology Division Communications, 10, 9-20.
  10. • Pyzdek T. (2000). Six Sigma and Lean Production, Quality Digest, p. 14.
  11. • Smith, W. (1992). Presentation at the Case Study Conference Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
  12. • Thomas, Beverly E. and Baron, John P. (1994). Evaluating Knowledge Worker Productivity: Literature Review , USACERL Interim Report FF-94/27, June 1994 .
  13. • Card, David N. (2006). The Challenge of Productivity Measurement, Proceedings: Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference, Q-Labs, Inc, (dca@qlabs.com ), 2006
  14. • [Harrington, H. James] (1987), Poor-Quality Cost, American Society for Quality, ISBN 9780824777432, OCLC 14965331
  15. • Sardana, G.D., and Prem Vrat, "A Model for Productivity Measurement in a MultiProduct Organization Using Programming and MultiAttribute Utility
  16. Theory," Productivity Management Frontiers I, edited by D.J. Sumanth (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1987), pp 3548.
  17. • Thor, Carl G., "Knowledge Worker Gainsharing," Productivity Management Frontiers I, edited by D.J. Sumanth (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1987), pp
  18. 305313.
✓ Citation copied to clipboard