Rising role of iot for Remote sensing disaster Application
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
A disaster is an event that causes great harm, destruction, and loss of life and livelihood. Disasters are mainly categorized as natural and manmade. The severe geophysical events like earthquake, volcanic eruption, and climatic events like flood and drought that destroys people lives and livelihood are called natural disasters. Natural disasters occur across the world and are inevitable. However, human intervention can minimize its effect through mitigation, proper planning, fast response time, and rehabilitation. In the case of natural disasters, the quick and accurate prediction is very crucial to minimize the social and economical effect. With the low-cost sensors, long-range networking, and AI this is easily achieved. Early warnings and predictions play a vital role. The IoT sensor that sends web-linked data to a digital command center which may be accessed by government officials remotely during a disaster is critical for urgent decisions. This real-time data obtained at regular intervals can give the real ground picture to the planners to work on mitigation measures. The quick response time in the case of disaster management can also be achieved using UAV technology. It provides high-resolution, real-time images of even the inaccessible area in a short time and maps it with the affected area to produce accurate hazard maps for better planning and response. In case of disaster, timing plays the most vital role. By integrating the historic data and real-time information obtained from IoT sensors with satellite/ drone data, a quick disaster response model can be built to make plans and reach the citizens who need help.
References
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794.
Corominas, L., et al. (2018). Transforming data into knowledge for improved wastewater treatment operation: A critical review of techniques. Environmental Modelling & Software, 106, 89–103.
Guo, H., et al. (2019). Prediction of effluent concentration in a wastewater treatment plant using machine learning models. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 32, 90–101.
Henze, M., et al. (2000). Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. IWA Publishing.
Maier, H. R., & Dandy, G. C. (2000). Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: A review of modelling issues and applications. Environmental Modelling & Software, 15(1), 101–124.
Newhart, K. B., et al. (2019). Data-driven performance analyses of wastewater treatment plants: A review. Water Research, 157, 498–513.
Olsson, G., et al. (2014). Instrumentation, control and automation in wastewater – from London 1973 to Narbonne 2013. Water Science and Technology, 69(7), 1373–1385.
Pai, T. Y., et al. (2011). Grey and neural network prediction of suspended solids and chemical oxygen demand in hospital wastewater treatment plant effluent. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 35(11), 2517–2521.
Zhan, Y., et al. (2018). Spatiotemporal prediction of daily ambient ozone levels across China using random forest for human exposure assessment. Environmental Pollution, 233, 464–473.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.