Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal

DIAS Technology Review

The Institute has a unique distinction of publishing a bi-annual International journal DIAS Technology Review – The International Journal for Business and IT. The Editorial Board comprises of...

P-ISSN: 0972-9658 English Since 2004
Current Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2004)

Articles 1st Edition of DTR Apr 2004
DOI 10.65301/dias.2004.1.1.183

Reinventing leadership: blended dualism

Authors
95 Views
136 Downloads
Published 2004-04-30
Pages 22-28
Abstract

Leadership needs to be redefined and explained differently in terms of what we have learned about organizational directorship during the last few decades. In addition to a new definition, a post twentieth century model of leadership needs created with steps and parameters opposite from pre-2000 thinking and philosophy. This article presents a new leadership definition and model, plus it identifies leadership parameters, steps, and lessons. Furthermore, it introduces a new concept in to m an agement / leadership / organization literature called Blended Dualism which incorporates the very latest supervisory thinking into a holistic, integrated amalgam of what initially appears to be contradictory or at least paradoxical ideas. 

References
  1. 1. ' Benin’s,W. (1989). Why Leaders Can 7 Lead. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  2. 2. Burns,J.M. (1988). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
  3. 2. Collins.!. (2001). "Lend5 Leadership: The Triumph of lhnnililyand Fierce Resolin'."
  4. 4. Harvard Business Review, January.
  5. 5. Conger. J. A A Kanungo, R. X. (1988). ('harismatic Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  6. 6. Fiedler, FE. (1967). A Theoiy o f Leadership Effectiveness. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
  7. 7. Green leaf, R. K. (1977). Servant Leadership. XewYork: Pan list Press.
  8. 8. Heifetz. R.A. (1994). Leadership With out E asy A nsw ers. C a m b rid g e. AIA: H a rva rd U n iversity Press.
  9. 10. Hosmer. I.. Y (1904). Morn I Leaders!) if ’In Husiurrs. (Uiicago: Richarrl I). Irwin.
  10. / 1. House. R. J. (19/11. A path-goal theory oj leadership effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, September.
  11. 12. Hue}'.). (1994). "The Xew Post-Heroic Leadership." Fortune. February.
  12. 13. Kahn. R. & Katz. D. (1960). Leadership practices in relations to productivityand morale. In Group Dynamics:
  13. Research and Theoiy, 2nd Edition, (eds.)!).(. '.arm n igh t and A. Zander. Flmsfor, New York: Row X Peterson.
  14. 14. Kotter, !.P.(1999). What Leaders Really Do. Boston: Harvard Business School PlVSS,
  15. 15. K ou-es. J. A1. & Posner. R. Z. (1095). The le a d e r s h ip C hallenge: / lo w To Keep C le ttin g Fix I in o r d in a r y T h in g s Done
  16. In Organizations. San Francisco: losscy-Bass.
  17. 16. O'Reilly C. A.& Pfeffer,J. (2000). Hidden Value. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  18. 17. Peters, T. XWaterman, R. H. (1998). In Search Of Excellence: Lesson From America's Best-Run Companies. NewYork:
  19. Harper & Row.
  20. 18. Senge, P.M.. Kleiner. A.. Roberts. Ross. R. B. X Smith, B.J. (1994). The Fifth Discipline F'ieldhook: Strategics And Tasks
  21. For Building A Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.
  22. 19. S ik u la .A . (1996). A p p lie d M a n a g e m e n t Ethics. Chicago: Richard IX Irwin.
  23. 20. Spears, L C. (1996). Reflections on Robert k. Green leaf and servant-leadership. Leadership & Organization
  24. Development Journal. 17. 7.
  25. 21. Spears, L C. (Ed.) (1998). Insights On Leadership. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  26. 22. Stogdill, R. M. & Coons, .4. E. (eds.) (1951). Leadership Behavior: Its Description and Measurement. Research MonographColumbus: Ohio State University Bureau of Business Research,
  27. 23. Tannenbaum, R. & Sch m idr, W. H. (19 73). Hou1 to choose a leadership pattern. Harvard Business Review, 51,3.
  28. 24. room, V. H. & Yetton, PW. (1973).Leadership and Decision Making. Pittsburgh: University o f Pittsburgh Press.
  29. 25. Yukl, G. (1989). Leadership In Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
✓ Citation copied to clipboard