Reinventing leadership: blended dualism

Main Article Content

Dr. Andrew Sikula
Dr. Chong W. Kim

Abstract

Leadership needs to be redefined and explained differently in terms of what we have learned about organizational directorship during the last few decades. In addition to a new definition, a post twentieth century model of leadership needs created with steps and parameters opposite from pre-2000 thinking and philosophy. This article presents a new leadership definition and model, plus it identifies leadership parameters, steps, and lessons. Furthermore, it introduces a new concept in to m an agement / leadership / organization literature called Blended Dualism which incorporates the very latest supervisory thinking into a holistic, integrated amalgam of what initially appears to be contradictory or at least paradoxical ideas. 

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Article Details

Section

Articles
RESEARCH ARTICLE

How to Cite

Reinventing leadership: blended dualism. (2004). DIAS Technology Review, 1(1), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.65301/dias.2004.1.1.183

References

1. ' Benin’s,W. (1989). Why Leaders Can 7 Lead. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

2. Burns,J.M. (1988). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

2. Collins.!. (2001). "Lend5 Leadership: The Triumph of lhnnililyand Fierce Resolin'."

4. Harvard Business Review, January.

5. Conger. J. A A Kanungo, R. X. (1988). ('harismatic Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

6. Fiedler, FE. (1967). A Theoiy o f Leadership Effectiveness. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.

7. Green leaf, R. K. (1977). Servant Leadership. XewYork: Pan list Press.

8. Heifetz. R.A. (1994). Leadership With out E asy A nsw ers. C a m b rid g e. AIA: H a rva rd U n iversity Press.

10. Hosmer. I.. Y (1904). Morn I Leaders!) if ’In Husiurrs. (Uiicago: Richarrl I). Irwin.

/ 1. House. R. J. (19/11. A path-goal theory oj leadership effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, September.

12. Hue}'.). (1994). "The Xew Post-Heroic Leadership." Fortune. February.

13. Kahn. R. & Katz. D. (1960). Leadership practices in relations to productivityand morale. In Group Dynamics:

Research and Theoiy, 2nd Edition, (eds.)!).(. '.arm n igh t and A. Zander. Flmsfor, New York: Row X Peterson.

14. Kotter, !.P.(1999). What Leaders Really Do. Boston: Harvard Business School PlVSS,

15. K ou-es. J. A1. & Posner. R. Z. (1095). The le a d e r s h ip C hallenge: / lo w To Keep C le ttin g Fix I in o r d in a r y T h in g s Done

In Organizations. San Francisco: losscy-Bass.

16. O'Reilly C. A.& Pfeffer,J. (2000). Hidden Value. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

17. Peters, T. XWaterman, R. H. (1998). In Search Of Excellence: Lesson From America's Best-Run Companies. NewYork:

Harper & Row.

18. Senge, P.M.. Kleiner. A.. Roberts. Ross. R. B. X Smith, B.J. (1994). The Fifth Discipline F'ieldhook: Strategics And Tasks

For Building A Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.

19. S ik u la .A . (1996). A p p lie d M a n a g e m e n t Ethics. Chicago: Richard IX Irwin.

20. Spears, L C. (1996). Reflections on Robert k. Green leaf and servant-leadership. Leadership & Organization

Development Journal. 17. 7.

21. Spears, L C. (Ed.) (1998). Insights On Leadership. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

22. Stogdill, R. M. & Coons, .4. E. (eds.) (1951). Leadership Behavior: Its Description and Measurement. Research MonographColumbus: Ohio State University Bureau of Business Research,

23. Tannenbaum, R. & Sch m idr, W. H. (19 73). Hou1 to choose a leadership pattern. Harvard Business Review, 51,3.

24. room, V. H. & Yetton, PW. (1973).Leadership and Decision Making. Pittsburgh: University o f Pittsburgh Press.

25. Yukl, G. (1989). Leadership In Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.