Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal

DIAS Technology Review

The Institute has a unique distinction of publishing a bi-annual International journal DIAS Technology Review – The International Journal for Business and IT. The Editorial Board comprises of...

P-ISSN: 0972-9658 English Since 2004
Current Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2007)

Articles 7th Edition of DTR Apr 2007 – Sep 2007
DOI 10.65301/dias.2007.4.1.380

Managing The Delivery of ‘Manufacture Processes’ in an Australian Regional Un-Known for Excellence in E-Learning

Authors
104 Views
154 Downloads
Published 2007-04-30
Pages 46-54
Abstract

The aim o f this paper is to share the author's experience in managing the delivery o f the course, Manufacturing Processes, in the Bachelor o f Engineering (Mechanical), Bachelor o f Engineering (Mechatronics), Bachelor o f Engineering Technology (Mechanical) and Associate Degree (Mechanical) programs offered by the University of Southern Queensland (USQ), a regional Australian University excellence in developing e-learning (Good fiuersity Guides, 2000). USQ is also a regional university, with campuses in Toowoomba, Fraser Coast and ingfield, Queens  land. The paper starts with defining the contents o f the course. The m ode o f delivery as well as
the on-going modifications to the contents o f the course is mentioned. A comparative study on e-learning against traditional learning was also deeply discussed with particular reference to Manufacturing Processes. It was concluded that the management o f the delivery had been not too bad in this regional university with limited resources. 

Keywords
Manufacturing Processes Academic Courses Practical Courses Off Campus Forming Operations and Cutting Operations
References
  1. DeVries, J. and Lim, G. (2003). Significance of online teaching vs. face-to-face: similarities and difference, presentation at E-LEARN 2003, the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education held in Phoenix, Arizona, USA, Nov. 7–11, 2003.
  2. Engineers Australia (2004a). Draft Stage 1 Competency Standards for BEng (Mechanical). Engineers Australia (2004b). Draft Stage 1 Competency Standards for BETC.
  3. Good Universities Guide (2001). Joint Winner University of the Year 2000–2001. http://www.usq.edu.au/aboutusq/awards/gugwinner.htm , p. 1.
  4. Groover, M. P. (2007). Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing, 3rd edition, Wiley.
  5. Ku, H. and Morgan, M. (2005). Manufacturing Processes, Study Book 1, USQ, pp. 2.13–2.14, 3.41–3.48.
  6. Ku, H. and Boundy, A. (2005). Manufacturing Processes, Study Book 2, USQ.
  7. Lim, G. (2001). A Framework for integrating technologies in teaching and learning, Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE), Vol. 2001, Issue 1, pp. 2751–2756.
  8. Lockhart, J. (2006). Learning to fit in with real world, The Australian, 26 April, p. 30.
  9. Morgan, M. J. and Brodie, L. M. (1996). Internationalisation of Engineering Education, 3rd Australian Women in Engineering Forum, Sydney.
  10. Morgan, M., Fulcher, R. and Ku, H. (1999). Innovative Residential Schools for Engineering Degree Courses, Journal of the Singapore Institute of Engineering Technologists, December 1999, pp. 53–58.
  11. Schasser, S. and Morgan, M. J. (1999). Professionally Accredited Australian Degrees in Engineering and Technology by Distance Education, Singapore Institute of Engineering Technologists, 19(1), pp. 57–62.
  12. USQ Handbook (2005). General Information Section, http://www.usq.edu.au/handbook/current/Geninfo , pp. 45–46.
  13. USQ Handbook (2006). Distance and e-Learning Centre Section, http://www.usq.edu.au/dec/staff/default.htm, p. 1.
✓ Citation copied to clipboard