Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal

DIAS Technology Review

The Institute has a unique distinction of publishing a bi-annual International journal DIAS Technology Review – The International Journal for Business and IT. The Editorial Board comprises of...

P-ISSN: 0972-9658 English Since 2004
Current Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2008)

Articles 9th Edition of DTR Apr 2008 – Sep 2008
DOI 10.65301/dias.2008.5.1.385

U.S. Manufacturing Industry: A study of Relationship between the Total Quality Management and Organizational Performances

Authors
89 Views
182 Downloads
Published 2008-04-30
Pages 16-24
Abstract

Our to those who have not. Using article compares the performances of manufacturers who have won quality related award svarious accounting indices as indicators o f performance, we test few o f the arguments being currently made in manufacturing strategy literature. Studies suggest that quality is now just a “qualifier,” as opposed to being an “order w inner” (Colyer, 2006; Hill 2000, page 36). To the extent, performance of award winners com pared to non-winners is better, quality can still be considered to have conferred advantage. Furthermore, insignificant differences in performances reinforce the notion o f quality as a qualifier. Another argument made in the literature is that companies that have implemented the TQM are also expected to be lean manufacturer (Hill, 2000 page 36; Easton an d Jarrell, 1998; Hendricks and Singhal, 1997). We have used some financial indices as indicators of leanness to test the differences between quality award winners an d non-winners.

Keywords
Total Quality Management Quality Manufacturing Perfomance
References
  1. Belhouse, Valerie, 2008, Quality Numbers: Six Sigma, Vision Systems Design, January, pp. 33–41.
  2. Chang, D., and Lee, M., 1995, Impact of JIT and organizational performance of U.S. Firms, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 33, No. 11, pp. 3053–3068.
  3. Colyer, E., 2006, The Power of ISO: Yes, the name of International Organization for Standardization is enough to put most people to sleep, so why is its acronym held dear?, The Business Week, March 17,
  4. http://www.businessweek.com/print/innovate/content/mar2006/id2006317_162347.htm
  5. Day, George S., 1994, The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, October, pp. 37–52.
  6. Diericks, I. and Cool, K., 1989, Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage, Management Science, 35(2), pp. 1504–1513.
  7. Easton, George S. and Jarrell, Sherry L., 1998, The effect of Total Quality Management on Corporate Performance: An Empirical Investigation, The Journal of Business, Vol. 71, No. 2, April, pp. 253–307.
  8. Fine, C., 1986, Quality Improvement and learning in Productive System, Vol. 32, Issue 10, pp. 1301–1315.
  9. Fishman, Charles, 2006, The Wal-Mart Effect: How the World’s Most Powerful Company Really Works – and How It’s Transforming the American Economy, The Penguin Press, New York.
  10. Friedman, Thomas L., 2006, The World is Flat: A Brief History of Twenty-First Century, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
  11. Gaur, Vishal; Fisher, Marshall L. and Raman, Ananth, 2005, An Econometric Analysis of Inventory Turnover Performance in Retail Services, Vol. 51, No. 2, February, pp. 181–194.
  12. Grant, Robert M., 1991, The Resource Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implication for Strategy Formulation, California Management Review, Spring, pp. 114–135.
  13. Hendricks, K. and Singhal, V., 1997, Does Implementing an Effective TQM Program Actually Improve Operating Performance? Empirical Evidence from Firms that have won Quality Awards, Management Science, Vol. 43, Issue 9, pp. 1258–1274.
  14. Hendricks, K. and Singhal, V., 1996, Quality Awards and Market Value of the Firm: An Empirical Investigation, Management Science, Vol. 42, Issue 3, pp. 415–436.
  15. Hill, Terry, 2000, Manufacturing Strategy: Text and Cases, McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston, Massachusetts.
  16. Holweg, Matthias and Pil, Fritz; Pil, K., 2004, The Second Century: Reconnecting Customer and Value Chain through Build-to-Order, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  17. Li, Gang and Ranganathan, S., 1998, Process Improvement, Quality and Learning Effects, Management Science, Vol. 44, Issue 11, pp. 1517–1532.
  18. Liker, Jeffrey K. and Choi, Thomas Y., 2004, Building Deep Supplier Relationships, The Harvard Business Review, December.
  19. Mukherjee, A., Lapré, M., and Wassenhove, L., 1990, Knowledge-Driven Quality Improvement, Management Science, Vol. 44, Issue 11, pp. 35–49.
  20. Rao, S. Subba; Solis, Luis E. and Raghunathan, T. S., 1999, A Framework for International Quality Management Research: Development and Validation of a Measurement Instrument, Total Quality Management, Vol. 10, No. 7, pp. 1047–1075.
  21. Subedi, Deepak and Maheshwari, Sumeet, 2007, Impact of Total Quality Management on Profitability and Efficiency on Baldrige Award Winners, Delhi Business Review, Jan–Jun 2007.
  22. Terwiesch, Christian and Cachon, Gerard, 2006, Matching Supply with Demand: An Introduction to Operations Management, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston, Massachusetts.
  23. Womack, J., Jones, D. and Roos, D., 1990, The Machine that Changed the World, Rawson Associates, New York.
✓ Citation copied to clipboard