The Mediating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploring Determinants and Indicators in Driving the Performance Constructs
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
management practice where companies integrate social, Economic (Profit) dimensions are considered when environmental and economic issues in business operations designing and implementing CSR strategies. Firms while addressing the expectations of all stakeholders. implement CSR through various practices. Few examples Corporate Social Responsibility practices have a of CSR practices such as Tata steel was the fi rst company signi cant in uence on the performance indicators making in India to incorporate social responsibility towards its it relevant in business for all societies, particularly for customers and the society. It started the thousand schools developing countries like India. The paper investigates project with the aim to revitalize primary education, Coca the mediating role of Corporate Social Responsibility on Cola India has consistently worked towards solving issues the Performance Indicators at IT sector that comprises of of water supply, sanitation, environmental pollution and Service Quality, Brand Identi cation, Goodwill Creation empowered women to stand up for themselves, Mahindra and Customer Satisfaction. Data collection is primary and Mahindra group schools (Pride schools) have been in nature administering a detailed questionnaire among empowering and educating youth from socially and employees working at IT sectors. Structural Equation economically weaker sections of the society to enable Modelling (SEM) is carried out to analyse structural them to get employment opportunities. Bharat Petroleum
References
Aguilera, R.V.; Rupp, D.E.; Williams, C.A.; Ganapathi, J. Putting the s back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32, 836–863.
Broomhill, R. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: Key issues and debates. Dunstan Paper, (1), 1- 31.
Brundtland, G.H. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development[www.are.admin.ch//o ur_ co mmon _fu turebrun dtland rep ort19 87 .pd f.download].
Carroll, A.B. A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1979, 4, 497-505.
Ellemers, N.; de Gilder, D.; Haslam, S.A Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Acad . M an ag. Rev. 20 04 , 2 9 , 459–478. [Available at http://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amr.2004.13670967].
Ellickson, M.; Logsdon, K. Determinants of job satisfaction of municipal government employees. Public Personnel Manag. 2002, 31, 343–358.
Fatma, M.; Rahman, Z.; Khan, I. Multi-item stakeholder based scale to measure CSR in the banking industry 2014. Int. Strateg. Manag. Rev. 2014, 2, 9–20.
Gharleghi, B.; Jahanshahi, A.A.; Nawaser, K. The Outcomes of Corporate Social Responsibility to Employees: Empirical Evidence from a Developing Country. Sustainability 2018, 10, 698.
Graafl and, J.J. Modelling the trade-off between profi ts and principles. Economist 2002, 150, 129–154.
Hategan, C.-D.; Sirghi, N.; Curea-Pitorac, R.-I.; Hategan, V.-P. Doing Well or Doing Good: The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profit in Romanian Companies. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1041.
Kemboi, A.; Kiprotich Mutai, S. Effects of internal Corporate Social Responsibility practices on employee job Satisfaction: Evidence from commercial banks in Kenya. Int. J. Bus. Manag. Rev. 2015, 33, 24–40.
Maignan, I.; Ferrell, O.C. Antecedents and benefi ts of corporate citizenship: An investigation of French businesses. J. Bus. Res. 2001, 51, 37–51.
Shields, M.A.; Price, S.W. Racial harassment, job satisfaction and intentions to quit Economica 2002, 69, 295–326.
Skarlicki, D.P.; Rupp, D.E. Dual processing and organizational justice: The role of rational versus experiential processing in third-party reactions to workplace mistreatment. J. Appl. Psychol. 2010, 95, 944–952. [www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20836589].
Tafjel, H.; Turner, J.C. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Social-Identity-Theory-of-Intergroup-Behavior.
Turban, D.B.; Greening, D.W. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad. Manag. J. 1997, 40, 658–672.
Waddock, S. The development of corporate responsibility/corporate citizenship. Organization Management Journal, 2008, 29-39.
Wilkinson, A.; Hill, M.; Gollan, P. The sustainability debate. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2001, 21, 1492–1502.
Zhu, Y.; Sun, L. Y.; Leung, A. S. M. Corporate social responsibility, firm reputation, and firm performance: The role of ethical leadership. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 2014, 31, 925–947.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.