Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal

International Journal of Communication Development

The International Journal of Communication Development (IJCD) is a new journal devoted to the analysis of communication, mass media and development in a global context in both Indian and...

P-ISSN: 2231-2498 English Since 2011
Current Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2026)

Articles Volume 17 Issue 1 January-June 2026

Role of Hindi Digital Media in Urban Youth's Eco-Behaviour: Content Analysis of Viral Campaigns

Authors
VIPS-TC
4 Views
3 Downloads
Published 2026-07-31
Pages 61-78
Abstract

Abstract 


This study investigates the role of Hindi digital media in shaping pro-environmental behaviour among urban youth in Delhi NCR, a region acutely affected by air pollution and climate vulnerability. It examines how leading Hindi media platforms Aaj Tak, Dainik Jagran, and ABP News utilize viral digital campaigns to frame ecological challenges and encourage sustainable lifestyle choices. Guided by framing theory, the research employs a content analysis of 30 viral multimedia campaigns from 2025 to 2026, each exceeding 500,000 views. These campaigns include short reels portraying solutions to Delhi’s smog, satirical memes by creators such as Saloni Gaur, and youth-led pledges addressing issues such as AQI crises and Yamuna River clean-up drives.


The coded categories centre on problem attribution, solution framing, and calls-to-action, providing insight into how narrative strategies influence environmental consciousness among Hindi-speaking audiences. The study highlights communicative strategies and emotional tones particularly the use of satire, humour, and solution-oriented storytelling that enhance audience engagement with environmental discourse. While acknowledging the role of digital virality in promoting eco-awareness, the study also reflects on the limitations of algorithmic echo chambers that may curtail message outreach and civic participation. It concludes by suggesting the integration of AI-based content targeting to strengthen the continuity and reach of digital environmental communication, thereby positioning Hindi media as a crucial driver of youth-led eco-engagement in urban India.

Keywords
Hindi digital media, environmental communication, youth engagement, framing theory Hindi digital media environmental communication
References
  1. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
  2. Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0353
  3. Billett, S. (2010). Dividing climate change: Global warming in the Indian mass media. Climatic Change, 99(1–2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9605-3
  4. Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Boykoff, M. T., & Roberts, J. T. (2007). Media coverage of climate change: Current trends, strengths, weaknesses. Human Development Report Occasional Paper. United Nations Development Programme.
  6. Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  7. Cinelli, M., Morales, G. D. F., Galeazzi, A., et al. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
  8. Corner, A., Roberts, O., Chiari, S., Völler, S., Mayrhuber, E., Mandl, S., & Monson, K. (2015). How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. WIREs Climate Change, 6(5), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.353
  9. Cox, R. (2013). Environmental communication and the public sphere (3rd ed.). Sage.
  10. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  11. Fielding, K. S., & Hornsey, M. J. (2016). A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors. Nature Climate Change, 6, 660–664. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3023
  12. Gurjar, B. R., Ravindra, K., & Nagpure, A. S. (2016). Air pollution trends over Indian megacities and their local-to-global implications. Atmospheric Environment, 142, 475–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.030
  13. Guttikunda, S. K., & Gurjar, B. R. (2012). Role of meteorology in seasonality of air pollution in megacity Delhi, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184, 3199–3211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2182-8
  14. Hart, P. S., & Feldman, L. (2016). The impact of climate change-related imagery and text on public opinion and behaviour change. Science Communication, 38(4), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547016655357
  15. Health Effects Institute. (2020). State of global air 2020. HEI.
  16. Highfield, T. (2016). Social media and everyday politics. Polity Press.
  17. Hornik, R., & Yanovitzky, I. (2003). Using theory to design evaluations of communication campaigns: The case of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign. Communication Theory, 13(2), 204–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00289.x
  18. IAMAI & Kantar. (2023). Internet in India report 2023. Internet and Mobile Association of India.
  19. Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2016). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. NYU Press.
  20. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage.
  21. Kreiss, D. (2016). Prototype politics: Technology-intensive campaigning and the data of democracy. Oxford University Press.
  22. Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C. Y., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2020). Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change, 5(11), 1014–1020. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2728
  23. McIntyre, K., & Gyldensted, C. (2018). Constructive journalism: An introduction and practical guide for applying positive psychology techniques to news production. Journalism Practice, 12(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1372533
  24. Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
  25. O’Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). “Fear won’t do it”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30(3), 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008329201
  26. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
  27. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.
  28. Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press.
  29. Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x
  30. Theocharis, Y. (2015). The conceptualization of digitally networked participation. Social Media + Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610140
  31. United Nations. (2019). World urbanization prospects 2018 revision. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
  32. United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). Making peace with nature. UNEP.
  33. Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017). Using expert sources to correct health misinformation in social media. Political Communication, 34(4), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334720
  34. World Bank. (2023). World development indicators: Urban population growth. World Bank.
  35. World Health Organization. (2022). Air quality database 2022 update. WHO.
✓ Citation copied to clipboard