Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal

Eduspectra

Army Institute of Education publishes EDUSPECTRA: AIE Interdisciplinary Journal of Research & Education, an annual peer reviewed journal (P-ISSN 2394-9430) which focusses on pertinent issues,...

P-ISSN: 2394-9430 English Since 2017
Current Issue

Vol. 6 No. 6 (2020)

Article Volume - 6 (2020)

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ACHIEVEMENT IN HINDI LANGUAGE AND CLASSICAL MUSICOF PRIMARY SCHOOL

Authors

Assistant Professor, Army Institute of  Education, Greater NOIDA UP

Assistant Professor LCE, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand

64 Views
75 Downloads
Published 2020-12-31
Pages 1-11
Abstract

This study was concerned with the achievement in Hindi Language and Classical Music of 100 primary school students of Jharkhand. The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between achievement in Hindi Language and Classical Music among primary school students. The researcher used descriptive survey method to study the problem. The tool for Hindi Language and Classical Music was self constructed and validated and was used for data collection, while't'- test and Pearson Product Moment Correlation used for statistical analysis. The results show that the female students are better than the male students in achievement in Hindi Language. The results revealed that there is no significant difference in Classical Music of male and female students. The results also explained the relationship between students achievement in Hindi Language and Classical Music. Result reflects that there is a significant relationship between achievement in Hindi Language and Classical Music of primary school students.

Keywords
Hindi Language, Classical Music, Primary school, lyrics, rhythm
References
  1. 1. Cross, I, Laurence, F, & Rabinowitch, TC (2012), 'Empathy and Creativity in Group Musical
  2. Practices: Towards a Concept of Empathic Creativity', in the Oxford Handbook of Music
  3. Education, Volume 2
  4. 2. Degé, F, Kubicek, C, & Schwarzer, G (2011) 'Music Lessons and Intelligence: a relation
  5. mediated by executive functions', Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(2),
  6. 195-201
  7. 3. John W. Best and James V. Kahn (1999), Research in Education, Prentice-Hall of India Pvt.
  8. Ltd, New Delhi.
  9. 4. Koelsch, S (2011) 'Toward a neural basis of music perception—a review and updated
  10. model’, Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 110
  11. 5. MacDonald, R, Kreutz, G, & Mitchell, L (eds) (2013) Music, Health, and Wellbeing, Oxford
  12. University Press
  13. 6. McTeer, H. J. and Bailey, R. T. 1980. The effect of the teaching technique using popular
  14. music upon students' attitudes toward history and subject matter knowledge. A study
  15. conducted at South Cobb High School, Austell, GA. April Dialog, ERIC, ED 196 749.
  16. 7. Medina, S.L. 1993. The effects of music upon second language vocabulary acquisition.
  17. National Network for Early language Learning, 6 (3). http://www.oocities.org/
  18. ESLmusic/articles/article01.html (accessed May 30, 2013).
  19. 8. Patel A. D. (2011). Why would musical training benefit the neural encoding of speech?
  20. The OPERA hypothesis. Front. Psychol. 2:142.10.3389/ fpsyg. 2011.00142
  21. 9. Peretz I., Nguyen S., Cummings S. (2011). Tone language fluency impairs pitch
  22. discrimination. Front. Psychol. 2:145.10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00145
  23. 10. Schon D., Francois C. (2011). Musical expertise and statistical learning of musical and
  24. linguistic structures. Front. Psychol. 2:167.10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00167
  25. 11. Shahin A. J. (2011). Neurophysiological influence of musical training on speech
  26. perception. Front. Psychol. 2:126.10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00126
  27. 11
  28. 12. Strait D. L., Kraus N. (2011). Can you hear me now? Musical training shapes functional
  29. brain networks for selective auditory attention and hearing speech in noise. Front. Psychol.
  30. 2:113.10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00113
  31. 13. Tllal P., Gaab N. (2006). Dynamic auditory processing, musical experience and language
  32. development. Trends Neurosci. 29, 382—39010.1016/j.tins.2006.06.003
  33. 14. Tillmann B., Burnham D., Nguyen S., Grimault N., Gosselin N., Peretz I. (2011). Congenital
  34. amusia (or tone-deafness) interferes with pitch processing in tone languages. Front.
  35. Psychol. 2:120.10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00120
  36. 15. Uppal, Monika, (2014),Reading and Communication, Shubhi Publications, Gurgaon,
  37. 79pp.
  38. 16. Vines B. W., Norton A. C., Schlaug G. (2011). Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances the
  39. effects of melodic intonation therapy. Front. Psychol. 2:230.10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00230
  40. 17. Wbster, P. 1990. Creativity as creative thinking. Music Educator's Journal, 76 (9), 22-28.
  41. 18. eisskoff, R. S. 1981. The relationship of pop/rock music to children's task performance
  42. and continuing motivation in language arts instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
  43. University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT
✓ Citation copied to clipboard