Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal

Eduspectra

Army Institute of Education publishes EDUSPECTRA: AIE Interdisciplinary Journal of Research & Education, an annual peer reviewed journal (P-ISSN 2394-9430) which focusses on pertinent issues,...

P-ISSN: 2394-9430 English Since 2017
Current Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019)

Article Volume - 5 (2019)

Impact of Peer Feedback Practices During Presentations on Selected Topics of Class Xi in Terms of Self Concept

Authors

Assistant Professor
ILVA Commerce & Science College Indore (M.P.)

28 Views
22 Downloads
Published 2019-12-31
Pages 57-64
Abstract

Feedback is advice or criticism about the quality of products, work, performance or ideas for the purpose of improvements. It provides an opportunity to an individual/person to comprehend own skills and capabilities. Feedback is a remark on the tasks performed by student's which may initiate constructive reflection during the next attempt by the learner. Students are required to identify strategies for improving the
way of putting own efforts to achieve success in work. The review indicates that selfconcept is about one's own efficiency, beliefs and capabilities and may be related to supervision in simulated circumstances and feedback about the outcomes. By keeping this point in mind, the researcher conducted the present study on peer feedback and its relationship with the self-concept. After seeking permission from Alpine Academy,
Indore (M.P.) twenty-one class IX students were selected as sample. They were allowed for peer feedback practices for presentations. The Children's self-concept scale developed by Dr. S. P. Ahluwalia and Dr. H. S. Singh (2012) was administered for studying the self-concept of the respondents. It employed a pretest-posttest single group design. The collected data were treated through the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. The findings indicate that the mean pre and post-self-concept scores at pre and posttest stage
of peer feedback practices differ significantly. Peer- feedback practices were found to be effective in terms of self-concept. The review also indicates significant improvement in the scholastic and non-scholastic performance of students after practicing peerfeedback. The present paper is an attempt for seeking the improved level of self-concept of the learners which can be transferred into routine life activities.

Keywords
Peer- feedback, Self- concept, Self- awareness, Presentation.
References
  1. Adediwura, A. (2015). Relationship between Learning Outcomes and Peer Assessment
  2. Practice, European Scientific Journal, 11 (16), 353- 368.
  3. Alshammari, M. (2015). The Role of Peer- and Self- Assessment in Developing Saudi
  4. EFLLearners' English Writing Skills, International Journal of Education, 8 (3), 85- 97.
  5. Retrieved January 22,2017 from http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/
  6. ije/article/viewFile/9853/8158
  7. Chen, C. (2010). The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peerassessment system, Computers and Education, 55, 229– 236. Taiwan, Retrieved
  8. February 07, 2017 from https://ir.nctu.edu.tw/bitstream/11536/32339/1/
  9. 000277110400023.pdf .
  10. Jain. H. (2005), Assessment of Learning and Instruction in Education, Delhi, Prentice
  11. Hall Juwah, C. (2003). Using Peer Assessment to Develop Skills and Capabilities.
  12. Aberdeen, Scotland, UK. In USDLA Journal, 17 (1). Retrieved January 22, 2014 from
  13. https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.as
  14. px?ReferenceID=590485
  15. Langan, A., Shukerb, D., Cullena, W., Penneyc, D., Preziosic, R. & Wheatera, C. (2008).
  16. Relationships between student characteristics and self, peer and tutor evaluations of oral presentations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33 (2), 179– 190.
  17. Retrieved Febrary 07, 2017 from http://synergy.standrews.ac.uk/shuker/files/2012/05/
  18. Langan-et-al-2008-AEHE.pdf doi: 10.1080/02602930701292498
  19. Liu, N. and David Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer
  20. assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11 (3), Retrieved Febrary 07, 2017 from
  21. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.708.2822&rep=rep1&type
  22. =pdf doi: 10.1080/ 1356 2510 6006 80582.
  23. Maheshwari, M. (2003). Differences in assessment of Anxiety among School Students,
  24. Indian Psychological Journal, 34 (5), 855– 865.
  25. Patri, M. (2002). The influence of peer feedback on self- and peer- assessment of oral
  26. skills, Language Testing, 19 (2) 109– 131. Retrieved February, 07, 2017 from
  27. http://www.drronmartinez.com/uploads/4/4/8/2/44820161/the_influence_of_peer_fee
  28. dback_on_self-assessment_language_testing-2002-patri-109-31.pdf
  29. Reese, N. (2005). Peer Evaluation as an Active Learning Technique. Journal of
  30. Instructional Psychology, 32 (4), 338- 345. Retrieved April 02, 2015, from
  31. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Peer+evaluation+as+an+active+learning+technique.a0
  32. 140412147
  33. Semiral, O. and Erhan, S. (2011). Peer Evaluation of Teamwork and Individual Student
  34. Achievement, 5th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium,
  35. 22- 24. Fırat University, ELAZIĞ- TURKEY, Retrieved September 30, 2014 from
  36. web.firat.edu.tr/icits2011/papers/27684.pdf
  37. Topping, K. (1998).Peer- assessment between students in colleges and universities.
  38. Review ofEducational Research,68 (3), 249- 276.
✓ Citation copied to clipboard