Peer-Review Policy

Eduspectra follows a rigorous, fair, and transparent peer review process to ensure the publication of high-quality scholarly work in the field of education. The journal is committed to maintaining academic integrity, originality, and relevance in all published manuscripts.

Initial Editorial Screening
Upon submission, each manuscript undergoes an initial screening by the Editorial Board to assess its suitability with the journal’s scope, originality, ethical compliance, and adherence to submission guidelines. Manuscripts failing to meet these criteria may be rejected at this stage without external review.

Review Process
Manuscripts that pass the preliminary screening are assigned to two or more subject experts with relevant expertise in the field of education. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on originality, relevance, methodological rigor, clarity of presentation, theoretical contribution, and significance to educational research and practice.

Reviewer Responsibilities
Reviewers are expected to provide constructive, objective, and timely feedback to help improve the quality of the manuscript. They must maintain confidentiality, declare any conflicts of interest, and refrain from using the manuscript content for personal advantage.

Author Revisions
Based on reviewers’ comments, authors may be asked to revise and resubmit their manuscripts. Authors are required to address all reviewer comments systematically and submit a revised version within the stipulated time. The revised manuscript may be sent back to reviewers for further evaluation, if necessary.

Editorial Decision
The final decision regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection of a manuscript rests with the Editor-in-Chief, based on reviewers’ recommendations and the overall quality of the manuscript. The editorial decision is communicated to the authors along with anonymized reviewer comments.

Confidentiality and Transparency
All manuscripts and reviewer reports are treated as confidential documents. The journal ensures transparency in the review process while safeguarding the integrity and anonymity of all stakeholders